The Press Republican

Wiley Wandering

« If God Doesn't Like Ugly...Should Anyone? | Main | Rape within Our Society »

If I’m a Puppet Who Is Pulling My Strings?

How do we reconcile our way of seeing as truly 20/20 vision, or succumbing to looking through lens that were designed to have us see what the manufacturer of the eyeglasses wanted us to see? How do we stop hating, especially when often our hate of others is packaged in ways that convince us we are not hating someone, but instead just don’t like them for reasons we can’t explain. Granted, if you don’t love someone it doesn’t have to default into being categorized as hatred for them. There is a place for ambivalence. On the other hand, in street jargon, “hating on someone” could be defined as an inexplicable dislike for someone that you don’t really even know.

I had a family member who easily bought into the ideology that all white people were blue eyed devils because of the actions of some. As a result of his belief, other family members of mine traveled down the path he established as a role model of ours, only to find themselves squarely situated in a disdain for white people that was limiting to them in a predominantly white society. Some of my family members never recovered from following the inadequate role modeling available to us. Some of the family members discomfort around White people made them dysfunctional when they had interactions with Whites, which may have contributed to a loss of opportunities that they otherwise may have changed their lives. I on the other hand never could reconcile the “all Whites are blue eyed devils” adage, finding it difficult to reconcile that thought with my knowledge of the role that White abolitionists played in helping Blacks achieve so-called freedom. And this was before I had ever heard of John Brown, the revolutionary abolitionist.

Neil LaBute, in his film, In the Company of Men, has two men targeting a woman for the pain other women have subjected them to. The depiction of these two men is preposterous in that people don’t really lash out at others of a cultural group because of the actions of one representative, do they? Seriously, do people actually dislike a group of people just because of the hype surrounding one? Just because one tall person has been insensitive to my height, just because one clear complexioned person has been insensitive to my skin, just because one non-smoker has been judgmental about a smoker, doesn’t mean that all tall, clear complexioned, or non-smoking individuals will judge us in similar ways, does it? Do we understand the reasons why people are insensitive and/or prejudge? Do you really think that a poor person came out of the womb resenting a wealthy person?

I know a professional colleague that I had heard some disconcerting things about that I must admit I now realize had me subconsciously judging him as pitiful, an embarrassment to his profession, and someone I really didn’t want to give any quality time to. Then recently I had my own experience with character assassination and realized that I wanted people to give me the benefit of the doubt. Does it take us being subjected to an unwarranted accusation or enduring an undeserved pain to realize that we all slip into that mode so easily?

There is a large population of people who never liked John F. Kennedy simply because he was our first Catholic president. There was/is a large population of people who didn’t like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, aside from their politics, because they were women who dared to run for high political office. There were people who didn’t like Jackie Robinson because he dared to think he could play at the level of well established professionals, perhaps because he was seen as a pawn of do-gooders, or perhaps because he was black. Weren’t all these individuals simply trying to succeed in our capitalistic society, pay their bills, raise their children. Granted, when people do dirt they give us the right to take umbrage with them, right? Well, perhaps if we stop and consider the old saying “let he who is free of sin cast the first stone.” Or how about the other one “people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.” Personally, recognizing that I most likely sinned sometime not long ago and will probably sin again soon I won’t be picking up stones anytime soon. Oh, and we all live in glass houses relative to someone’s way of seeing.

I remember so many times I was poised to brief someone about a person they would be soon meeting and had to stop myself, realizing that I was about to possibly pollute two people’s first meeting with my biased perspective.

I grew up hating homosexuals because others around me hated homosexuals (though actually it was fear of the unknown lifestyle or fear of being associated and thereby considered gay that stoked the fire of hate). I ignorantly ranted and raved about gays as if I had actual data that could prove that they should be hated. I didn’t realize that all I was doing was proving that my way of seeing wasn’t mine, but someone else’s that I had ignorantly borrowed.

I recently had the pleasure of engaging a renowned military college in a lengthy diversity session. The room was full of approximately 300 1st year cadets, all in uniform. It was one of the most intimidating presentations I’ve ever done. I was paranoid that a black man from Plattsburgh, by way of South Central Los Angeles and the North side of Tulsa wouldn’t have much of a connection with an impressive group of our future leaders who were poised to embark upon careers that I never really considered an option. I wondered if there way of seeing would be receptive to mine. While I am sure we are miles apart in terms of the detail in our ways of seeing, we did have a couple of things in common. A high majority of them were very much committed to becoming the best leaders that they could be. When I challenged them to move beyond the negative preconceptions they might have about diversity and instead to lean into the conversation with me and actively participate because it was a conversation for them and about them, I felt the room shift. We talked about why we (people) prejudge. We talked about why we buy into the hype people are constantly putting before us about others. We talked about the role we have as so-called leaders to recognize that the easiest thing for us to do is to take the all to comfortable shortcut and not give people the benefit of the doubt. We also talked about how real leaders don’t take those shortcuts, but instead do some real thinking about the issues they must confront and people they meet. Never before have I left a conversation with young women and men and felt so proud to be an American and comfortable with the future direction of our country, largely predicated upon how these future leaders received my challenge to their way of seeing. I know they only comprise an infinitesimal percentage of our future military leadership, but hey, a brother can fantasize can’t he?

How do we reconcile our way of seeing as truly 20/20 vision, or succumbing to looking through lens that were designed to have us see what the manufacturer of the eyeglasses wanted us to see? When are we going to start looking at people the way we want them to look at us? How do we communicate to others that “others” we don’t know deserve the benefit of the doubt.


TrackBack URL for this entry:


To reconcile my way of seeing, I try to look at life through multiple lenses and see how the glasses match each other. This is no simple task and I am still an amateur, but with dedication to this newly found lifestyle, I am confident that every day is an opportunity to grow.

This all sounds swell in theory but when put into practice, it is much more difficult. I have put myself into situations where I have come out as the victim (from my perspective) in certain relationships with women. Now, I could tell say that all females are “female dogs” and “prostitutes”, slandering an entire group of people because of the mistake (arguable) of a few women; or I can take a breath and consider the possibility that it might just be me. There are probably other options too, can anyone else think of some?

It’s somewhat funny. The fact that I have been, or feel that I have been, a victim in my experiences with women should probably give me more sympathy and assist in my compassion toward them rather than label them as less than. I feel as though some people do not learn from being subjugated. They (we) just turn it right back around on the people who hurt us, or others who we have an opportunity to subjugate ourselves. What we learn from being subjugated is that it must be fun to do or else others wouldn’t do it to us, right? When we have the reign, we often abuse it.

J.W., you have the power to exert yourself as a professor, a consultant, a father, etc. What you did at Norwich was use that power for the greater good. I had no idea you were so nervous going into the presentation and the reasons contributing to that nervousness. I now understand in greater depth your passion behind the Norwich presentation. You have a way with writing!

“Puppets on strings aren’t responsible for things.” -J.W. Wiley

It’s interesting that you talk about homosexuality along with your presentation to a room full of cadets when one of the top news stories in the military these days is repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" rule. I’d be interested to know the cadets’ general take on that. Personally, when the shooting starts, I don’t think a soldier gives a hoot about the sexual orientation, color, gender, shoe size or favorite baseball team of the soldier on their left or right. They probably care a lot more about who can SHOOT straight than who IS straight.

Pre-judging others is a defense mechanism. No matter how bad the “known” is, the “unknown” is always imagined to be worse. So in order to turn someone from an “unknown” quantity into a “known” quantity as quickly as possible, we must categorize them. And if we can do that before we even meet them, so much the better.

I’ve dealt directly with the public in every career I’ve had and I can tell you, I’ve been prejudged thousands (tens of thousands?) of times. I’ve actually come to expect it. For a long time, I would try to put up different defense mechanisms to deflect the negative vibes I felt coming toward me. What I’ve found is that the best defense is no defense at all. Honesty and sincerity are really the only things that can change others’ incorrect perceptions or pre-judgments about us. There’s actually a liberating feeling that comes with knowing you’ve been yourself all day long and those you’ve encountered can take it or leave it; it’s all the same to you.

I still have a hard time, though, with situations you described early in your post, JW, where someone I trust may have personally disparaged someone else I’m about to meet. I try not to let those disparagements interfere with my interactions, but, it is very difficult – more so in business than in social settings. If I start to feel a bad vibe toward someone I try to “check myself” and ask “am I feeling this way because of this interaction, or, because of what others told me to expect from this person?” But again – it’s not easy.

I think I’ve become a more relaxed, confident, sincere person since I realized that we all have “junk in the trunk”, sins, faults, call it whatever you like. There are a few people I know well enough to know most of their sins – and they know mine. And we’re still friends, even good friends. Those are the most satisfying relationships of all.

On a more broad scale, I think I’ve been very lucky to have positive and negative experiences with a diverse group of people so that I’m not likely to prejudge someone based on gender, skin color, sexual orientation, etc. Admittedly, there are a few “reflex judgments” that I sometimes catch myself making, but, I can usually squash them with a bit of self-admonishment.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)